OCULAR SURGERY NEWS 2/25/2010
What are the long-term benefits and risks of PK vs. DSEK?

PK eliminates interface
 Roger F. Steinert
|
Penetrating keratoplasty replaces all layers of the cornea. This
eliminates optical degradation from alterations in the surface and stroma that
accompany epithelial and stromal edema. The successfully healed PK has normal
thickness and avoids the creation of an interface, as lamellar techniques
require, that frequently degrades both high-contrast visual acuity and the
quality of vision. However, PK also requires a 360° incision that heals
slowly and often introduces both astigmatism and higher-order aberrations. The
goal of femtosecond laser incisions in PK is to improve the integrity of the
incision and the postop optics.

Roger F. Steinert, MD, is an OSN Cornea/External
Disease Board Member.

EK offers rapid visual recovery, stable refraction
 Edward J. Holland
|
In 2007, 37% of all corneal transplants and 85% of grafts performed for
endothelial disease in the U.S. were endothelial keratoplasty. Advantages of EK
over PK include faster visual rehabilitation and refractive stability,
decreased surgically induced astigmatism, fewer sutures yielding fewer
suture-related complications and a smoother anterior corneal surface, better
tectonic stability, avoidance of open-sky, less irregular astigmatism and
faster operating times.
As for outcomes, we recently reported that with thin tissue (less than
131 µm), 100% of patients had best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or
better and 71% obtained 20/20 vision after DSEK. A review of 34 articles found
a mean postoperative change in refractive cylinder of 0.11 D and an average
graft survival of 94% at 1 year after DSEK.
However, EK is not exempt from complications. Donor dislocation is the
most common complication, occurring in 14.5% of cases. Also, endothelial cell
loss at 1 year (42%) is substantially higher than in PK. Average rejection rate
for DSEK has been reported at 10%. Glaucoma after DSEK can occur either by
pupil-block secondary to the air bubble in the postoperative period or by
steroid-induced glaucoma.
Based on personal experience and overwhelming support from the
peer-review literature, the advantages of endothelial keratoplasty
significantly outweigh the disadvantages, and we strongly advocate endothelial
keratoplasty in all cases of isolated endothelial disease.

Edward J. Holland, MD, is an OSN Cornea/External
Disease Board Member.

Copyright ® 2010 SLACK Incorporated. All rights reserved.